(Natural News) A new pre-print paper published at bioRxiv reveals that long after a person gets “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) with an mRNA series of injections, the spike proteins generated as a result of the shots persist in their brain tissue.
Researchers out of Germany and Denmark evaluated brain tissue samples both in mouse models and post-mortem humans, looking for the presence and distribution of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. They specifically looked at the skull-meninges-brain axis.
They found that spike protein from the shots accumulates in the skull marrow, brain meninges and brain parenchyma, further explaining that the “injection of the spike protein alone caused cell death in the brain, highlighting a direct effect on brain tissue.”
Even long after a “positive” covid test and infection has passed, spike proteins continue to remain lodged in the human brain. Researchers say these lingering spike proteins could contribute to long-term neurological symptoms such as brain “fog” and brain tissue loss.
“The spike protein was associated with neutrophil-related pathways and dysregulation of the proteins involved in the PI3K-AKT as well as complement and coagulation pathway,” the paper explains.
“Overall our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trafficking from CNS borders into the brain parenchyma and identified differentially regulated pathways may present insights into mechanisms underlying immediate and long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 and present diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities.”

Up until recently the federal government, along with some state and local authorities were pressing Americans to continue getting repeated covid shots and “boosters,” claiming that doing so was the only way to prevent this type of toxic buildup from occurring.
It turns out that the more covid shots a person takes, the more these spikes proteins and who-knows-what-else gets distributed throughout the body, including inside brain tissue, resulting in potentially very serious long-term health problems.
Early on the world was promised that the contents of these shots dissipate not long after they are injected, leaving behind nothing more than immunity and protection against covid. We now know that this was all a lie, and that the contents of the shots do linger, perhaps forever, while the protection does not.
Walter Chestnut from WMCResearch.org was warning about this back in 2021 following the launch of Operation Warp Speed. He stated that the “robust immune response” the shots supposedly produce, at least according to government officials, “may come at a lethal cost” – and he was right.
It turns out that numerous peer-reviewed studies even back then revealed that spike proteins from injections lodge themselves throughout the body and stay there, deactivating a person’s telomerase, causing premature aging and possibly death.
As telomeres shorten over time, they expose a person’s DNA to increasing levels of corruption, which is when aging symptoms really start to appear. In the case of covid shots their spike proteins appear to accelerate the breakdown of telomerase, resulting in rapid aging and premature death for many.
“They will soon be begging for a cure from this new pestilence that they invited into their bodies,” one person wrote about the “fully vaccinated” who are likely regretting their decision to get jabbed right about now.
“Maybe the ‘vaccinated dead’ will be the group to rise up and destroy their makers, kind of like in the book ‘Frankenstein,'” wrote another. “That would be ironic, but I am sure these b***ards who made the ‘vaccine’ have already gamed out that scenario as a possibility.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-05-09-covid-vaccine-spike-proteins-persist-brain-tissue.html
...........................
Big Pharma claimed that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines were “safe and effective.” The vaccines were also recommended by public health authorities for pregnant women even though it was unusual for a new class of medicine.
By late 2021 adult women, including pregnant women, were losing their jobs because they chose not to get vaccinated. Those who signed up for COVID-19 vaccines did so because they trusted health authorities, especially since the vaccines wouldn’t have been approved if the evidence was not clear.
However, data from Pfizer has revealed that COVID-19 vaccines could harm pregnant women.
Thanks to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request, a lengthy vaccine evaluation report sponsored by Pfizer and submitted to the Australian regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), on January 2021 was released.
The report revealed new data that had been suppressed by TGA and Pfizer about the safety of the COVID vaccines for pregnant women and their effects on the fertility of women of childbearing age.
Here are four key points from the report:
1. The rapid decline in antibody and T cells observed in monkeys following the second dose of the vaccine.
2. Biodistribution studies, which were previously released in 2021 through an FOI request in Japan.
3. Data on the fertility outcomes in rats.
4. Data on fetal abnormalities in rats.
Concerning the first point, the report revealed that antibodies and T cells in monkeys declined within five weeks after the animals were given a second dose of BNT162b2 (V9), raising concerns over long-term immunity.

The first point highlights the fact that the regulators should have anticipated the rapid decline in vaccine efficacy. They also must have known that the initial two-dose “course” was unlikely to give lasting immunity and would eventually need multiple repeat doses.
The three remaining points should be a major cause for alarm with the pharmaceutical regulatory system.
With regards to vaccine impact on fertility and fetal abnormalities the report referenced a study involving 44 rats that describes two main metrics: pre-implantation loss rate and the number of abnormalities per fetus. In both cases the metrics were much higher in vaccinated rats compared to the unvaccinated rats.
The pre-implantation loss ratio compared the estimated number of fertilized ova and the ova implanted in the uterus. According to a table from the report, the loss rate for the vaccinated (BNT162b2) rats is more than double the unvaccinated control group.
In a case-control study a doubling of pregnancy loss in the intervention group point to a serious safety signal.
But instead of taking the matter seriously, the authors of the report compared the outcomes to historical data on other rat populations, specifically 27 studies of 568 rats. The study authors also ignored the outcome because other populations had recorded higher overall losses.
But the analysis is worrying because it remains below the highest previously recorded pregnancy loss levels in populations elsewhere. It is not a safe outcome, particularly when the intervention is also linked to twice the harm observed in the control group.
A similar pattern was observed for fetal malformations, with higher abnormality rates in all of the 12 categories studied. Out of the 11 categories where Pfizer confirmed the data is correct, there are only two total abnormalities in the control group, compared to 28 with the mRNA vaccine.
In the category that Pfizer labeled as unreliable (supernumerary lumbar ribs), there were three abnormalities observed in the control group and 12 in the vaccinated group. Pfizer also ignored the trend and compared the results with historical data from other rat populations.
The case-control nature of the study design was again ignored, perhaps to hide the negative outcomes demonstrated. The data from the report suggests that there is no reliable basis for claiming that COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women.
The concentration of lipid nanoparticles (LNP) in the ovaries, a doubled pregnancy loss rate and raised fetal abnormality rate across all measured categories suggest that designating a safe-in-pregnancy label (B1 category in Australia) was contrary to the evidence presented in the report.
The data suggests that the government’s “safe and effective” claims were not only inaccurate, they were also misleading.
Despite the negative nature of these outcomes, the classification of the Pfizer vaccine as a “safe” vaccine seems to have precluded further animal trials. In the past, new medicines, especially those never tested or used in humans before, needed a very rigorous assessment.
But vaccines have a lower burden of proof requirement than ordinary medications. Therefore classifying mRNA injections as “vaccines” ensured regulatory approval with less stringent safety requirements, as noted by the TGA.
mRNA gene therapies function more like medicines than vaccines because they modify the internal functioning of cells instead of stimulating an immune response to the presence of an antigen.
Labeling these gene therapy products as vaccines implies that, as far as the public is aware no genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies have been carried out to ensure their safety.
The report which was only released after an FOI request is alarming because it reveals that the authorities knew of the major risks associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccination yet still told the public the vaccines were safe.
It seems that mainstream media is working with Big Pharma and authorities to ignore the newly released data. Don’t fall prey to those in power and be cautious when listening to public health messaging about coronavirus vaccination.
After all, it’s obvious that regulators, drug companies and government knew that vaccine-induced immunity trails off rapidly just as it was observed in real-world data, with efficacy against infection recorded as falling to zero.
The single point-in-time figures of 95 percent and 62 percent efficacy quoted for Pfizer and AstraZeneca, respectively, implies almost nothing since a rapid decline was to be expected.
The concept of a two-dose “course” was also inaccurate since more boosters would have been required due to rapid decline in antibodies and T-cells observed in monkeys.
The data also does not support the “safe” conclusion concerning pregnancy; rather, it should be considered harmful for pregnant women. The assurances of safety were misleading, as proven by data disclosures in the recent FOI release.
Regulatory authorities knew that animal studies provided evidence of both pregnancy loss and fetal abnormalities, consistent with the systemic distribution of the mRNA vaccines. Pfizer decided not to follow up on the vast majority of pregnancies in the original human trials, despite high miscarriage rates in the minority they followed.
With all the evidence about vaccine efficacy and safety the administration of these products to pregnant women and those of childbearing age was a high-risk move and certainly not justified.
Watch the video below to learn how COVID-19 https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-05-09-pfizer-covid-vaccines-never-safe-pregnant-women.html
Comments
Post a Comment